Chapter 6
1. You have been asked by the manager of software
development to lead a small group of software developers in an attempt to
reengineer the latest release of the software by your leading competitor. The
goal of the group is to identify features that could be implemented into the
next few releases of your firm software. You are told that the group would
relocate from the United States to the island of Antigua, in the Caribbean Sea,
to “reduce the risk the group being destructed by the daily pressures
associated with developing fixes and enhancements with the current software
release.” What sort of legal and/or ethical questions might be raised by the
reengineering effort? Would you consider taking this position?
ANSWER: In this scenario, the legal and/or ethical
questions that might be raised were “How much
effort and money to invest to ensure high-quality software and whether products
could cause damage and what the legal exposure would be if they did? These are
the ethical questions concerned in developing software with high quality. As an
employee being asked by my manager to lead a small group of software
developers, I would consider this position only if certain conditions would be
met. First, the manager must give us the guarantee that there are adequate equipment
and functional facilities needed in developing the software. Aside from that,
there should also be the important things needed to support us as developers
like food, water and etc. Second and the most important, they must make sure
that we are secure in the place where we are to be destined. And lastly, they should
take liable on what might happen to our team while we are making the software.
If these were not granted, of course I will not take the said position because
it could put me and the developers’ team in risks.
2. You have procrastinated to long and now your final
paper for your English course is due in just 5 days- right in the middle of the
final exam week! The paper counts for half your grade for the term and would
probably take you at least 20hrs. Of research and write. Your roommate, an
English major with a 3.8GPA, has suggested 2 options. (1) He will write an
original paper for you for $100, or (2) he will show you 2 of 3 “paper mill”
websites, from which you can download a paper for less than $35. You wanted to
do the right thing, but writing the paper will take away from the time you have
available to study for your final exam in 3 other courses. What would you do?
ANSWER: This is a hard situation for me because as a
student it is certain that we will do whatever it takes for the sake of having
good grades. In this case that I have to make a final paper for my English
course in a very limited length of time while studying for the final exam, it
is somewhat enticing to choose the easiest way just to finish my final paper. But
I still have to consider what is right and just, therefore I might refuse what
my roommate has suggested. The best alternative that I must do is to manage my
time well for studying and making my final paper. I could also use some
references for my research and get ideas on it that I will be using as I begin
to write my final paper then recognize the author afterwards. In this way, I
could have my final paper done in a right way. It shows a different feeling of
success and fulfillment when you know that you have done your work at your own.
3. You are beginning to feel very uncomfortable in your
new position as a computer hardware salesperson for a firm that is the major
competitor of your previous employer. Today for the second time, someone has
mentioned to you how valuable it would be to know what the marketing a new
product development plans whereof your ex-employer. You stated that you are unable
to discuss such information under the non disclosure contract signed with your
former employer, but you know your response did not satisfy your new
co-workers. You fear that the pressure to reveal information about the plans of
your former company is only going to increase over the next few weeks. What do
you do?
ANSWER: Following the most ethical way is the thing
that I should do in this kind of situation. I have to keep confidential what my
previous employer and I have been contracted. It is not just concealing the
information from my previous employer’s firm but also preventing me from the
possible cases that my previous employer might file against me if I discuss to
them such information. I have to be firm on my decision because I know that it
is the best thing to do. If it will cause for working uncomfortably, I think
it’s time to find another employer and job for me because it will degrade my
performance in the workplace if it will continue to upset me.
4. You have been asked to lead your company’s new
competitive intelligence organization. What would you do to ensure that members
of the new organization obey applicable law and the company’s’ own ethical
policies.
ANSWER: Competitive
Intelligence is gathering of legally obtainable information to help
a company gain an advantage over rivals. It is often integrated into a
company’s strategic plans and decision making. To lead the company’s competitive
intelligence organization, I would make guidelines checking if certain
competitive intelligence operation is ethical. The following are some examples
of these guidelines:
ü The competitive
intelligence organization must develop a mission statement, objectives, goals,
and a code of ethics.
ü The company’s legal
department must approve a mission statement, objectives, goals, and a code of
ethics.
ü The analysts and
members must understand all applicable laws.
ü The analysts and
members must understand that everything in the firm learns about the
competition must be obtain legally.
ü The analysts and
members must respect all requests for anonymity and confidentiality of
information.
ü The company’s legal
department must first approve the processes for gathering data.
ü The use of third
parties to gather competitive intelligence must review and manage carefully.
5. You are the vice president for software development at
a small, private firm. Sales of your firm’s products have been strong, but you
recently detected a patent infringement by one of your larger competitors. Your
in-house legal stuff has identified 3 options: (1) ignore the infringement out
of fear that your larger competitor will file numerous countersuits; (2)
threaten to file suite, but try to negotiate an out-of-court settlement of an
amount of money.
ANSWER: As a Vice President, I would follow the 2nd
option suggested by my in-house legal stuff which is to threaten to file suite,
but try to negotiate an out-of-court settlement of an amount of money. The
reason behind my decision is that I wanted to be more practical and I don’t
want to waste so much time, effort and money going to court every time there
will be a hearing for filing a case against them.
Chapter 7
1. Apple Guidelines
for App Approval
Apple’s App Store has
been a huge success ever since it was launched in 2008. As of the end of 2010,
the app store offered more than 250, 000 applications available for sale to
owners of apple, iPhone, iPad and iPod devices, with more than 6.5 Billion
downloads since it opened.
Before software
applications can be solved through the App Store, they must go through a review
process. Apple has been accused by some of using clandestine and capricious
rules to reject some programs and thus blocking them from reaching the very
large and growing market of iPhone, iPad, and iPod touch users. One application
developer complained: “ if you submit an app, you have no idea whats going to
happen. You have no idea it’s going to be approved or if it’s going to be
disapproved.” The developers of an app called “South Park” complained that
their app was rejected because the content was deemed “potentially offensive ,”
even though episodes of the award-winning animated sitcom are available at the
Apple iTunes Store. In September 2010,
after more than two years of complains, apple finally provided applications
developers the guidelines it uses to review software.
Most guidelines seem
to be aimed at ensuring that Apple users can only access high quality and
non-controversials Apps from its Apps Store. Some of the Apple guidelines are
clear and their rationale is easy to understand, such as “ apps that rapidly
drain the device’s battery or generate excessive eat will be rejected.”
However, other guidelines are unclear and highly subjective, such as “ we will
reject apps for any content or behavior that we believe is over the line.” What
line, you ask? Well, as a Supreme Court Justice once said ,“ I’ll know it when
i see it. ‘ and we think that you will also know it when you cross it. (“ I
know it when I see it” was the phrase used by U.S Supreme Court Justice Potter
Stewart to describe his ability to recognize rather than to provide a precise
definition of hard core pornography and his opinion in the cae Jacobellis v.
Ohio in 1964.)
The electronic
frontier foundation believes that while the guidelines are helpful, in some
cases apple is defining the content of third-party software and placing limits
on what is available to customers of Apple’s App Store.
By way of comparison,
Google places few restrictions and developers of software for its competing
Android Marketplace. However, there have been many low-quality applications
offered to Android Marketplace customers, including some that include unwanted
malware. Indeed by early 2011, google had pulled 21 Android applications from
its Android Marketplace because, once downloaded, the applications not only
stole users’ information and device data but also created a back door for even
more harmful attacks. Apple’s decision to finally share applications guidelines
may have been an attempt to combat the rapidly increasing popularity the
android. It may also have been a response to a U.S Federal Trade Commissions
investigations of a complaint for Adobe concerning Apples banning of the flash
software from devices that run using Apple’s iOS operating system (Adobe Flash
player is a browser-based applications that runs in many computer hardware/
operating system combination and support the viewing of called “rich,
expressive applications,” content, the videos across screens and browsers .)
Discussion Questions:
1. Should Apple conduct extensive screening of Apps
before they are allowed to be sold on the App Store? Why or why not?
ANSWER: Yes, I agree that Apple should conduct
extensive screening of Apps before they are allowed to be sold on the App Store
because it means that they are making sure if certain Apps were safety to
customers and if it possesses high quality. It is somehow giving an assurance
that the Apps sold on the App Store could not harm its users and the
devices/gadgets being used by them.
2. Do research to determine the current status of the FCC
investigation of Apple for banning use of the Adobe Flash software and devices
that use the iOS operating system.
ANSWER: The Apple and Adobe Flash controversy refers to an ongoing controversy
between Apple Inc. and Adobe Systems over
the Adobe Flash technology,
and specifically the Adobe Flash Player and its usage on Apple iOS devices such as the iPhone and iPad. In April 2010, Steve Jobs,
the co-founder and chief executive officer of Apple Inc. published an open letter explaining
why Apple wouldn't allow Flash on the iPhone, iPod touch
and iPad. In the letter he
cited the rapid energy consumption, poor performance on mobile devices, abysmal
security, lack of touch support, and desire to avoid "a third party layer
of software coming between the platform and the developer". He also
touched on the idea of Flash being "Open", claiming that "By
almost any definition, Flash is a closed system".
Jobs
also tried to dismiss the idea that Apple customers are missing out by being
sold devices without Flash compatibility. He quoted a number of statistics and
concluded with "Flash is no longer necessary to watch video or consume any
kind of web content." The "Thoughts on
Flash" post drew immediate
and harsh criticism with Steve Jobs being accused of hypocrisy or of
deliberately misleading. Jobs' assertion that Flash is not open, or closed and
proprietary, attracted a great deal of attention with references to open source
projects that take advantage of Adobe making the Flash specification open for
developers to build on.
Adobe's CEO Shantanu Narayen responded by saying, "If Flash is the number one
reason that Macs crash, which I'm not aware of, it has as much to do with the
Apple operating system."
Some members of the industry claimed that Steve Jobs rejected
Flash on the iPhone for business reasons, rather than the technical reasons he
mentions in his letter:
3. What do you think of Apple’s guidelines that say it
will reject an App for any content or behavior that they believe is over the
line? Could such statement be construed as a violation of the developer’s
freedom of speech? Why or why not?
ANSWER: For me, I think that
Apple’s guidelines are right and just because of its good intention. I don’t see
it as a violation of the developer’s freedom of speech because what Apple has
done is also their right as an organization. It is their willpower on how they
will carry their company including their policies and guidelines.